This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 2, 2014

High court to consider admissiblity of traffic camera photos

The state Supreme Court could save each of us upwards of $500 this week, as on April 3 it will hear oral argument in People v. Goldsmith. By Patrick Santos


By Patrick Santos


The state Supreme Court could save each of us upwards of $500 this week, as on April 3 it will hear oral argument in People v. Goldsmith, No. 8231678. The case deals with an issue that touches the lives of thousands of Californians every day - the automated traffic enforcement system (ATES), otherwise known as a red light camera traffic ticket.


Generally, there are two reasons why the state Supreme Court exercises its discretion...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up