This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 27, 2014

Tactic to sidestep medical damages limits shutdown

Last month, the 2nd District threw a roadblock in the way of a particular maneuver intended to avoid limits on medical expenses that plaintiffs can recover. By Barry Rodolff


By Barry Rodolff


In its August 2011 landmark decision Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions Inc., 52 Cal. 4th 541 (2011), the state Supreme Court held that an injured plaintiff whose medical expenses are covered by insurance cannot recover more for such expenses than his health insurer actually paid his doctors and hospitals. The much larger amount those doctors and hospitals almost certainly billed the plaintiff is irrelevant. "Where the provider...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up