This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Mar. 26, 2014

Some judges resist settlements in major government cases

Judicial officers at all levels routinely push for settlements. However, some judges have been pushing in opposite direction when they feel prosecutors and government regulators have not held a business or individuals accountable.


By Henry Meier


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Judicial officers at all levels routinely push for settlements. However, some federal judges have been pushing in opposite direction - going so far as to deny a settlement - when they feel prosecutors and government regulators have not held a business or individuals accountable.


The most well known example of judicial reticence to approve a deal is U.S. District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff's denial ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up