David Carrillo and Stephen Duvernay's article, "Six Problems With 'Six Californias' Initiative" (March 11), offers a thoughtful critique of certain constitutional aspects of that initiative. They are clearly correct in their principal critique to point out that the initiative seeks to "revise" the state Constitution (requiring a Legislative supermajority, state constitutional convention, and majority vote of the citizens) rather than merely "amend" it (requiring only a majority vote of the...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In