This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Feb. 6, 2016

Good for energy costs, and our climate

It's not often that members of the real world, even the regulatory world, stop to pay attention to a court case involving the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the federal agency overseeing the nation's transmission system. By Allison Clements

Allison Clements

See more...

By Allison Clements

It's not that often that members of the real world, even the regulatory world, stop to pay attention to a court case involving the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission - the federal agency overseeing the nation's transmission system. But that happened last week when the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important 6-2 decision (Justice Samuel Alito abstained) in FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association, 14-840 (EPSA

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up