This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

May 31, 2007

Critics Question Contracts That Shift Job Disputes Out of State

Some lawyers allege that companies are trying to skirt California’s employee-friendly laws by binding their employees to settle disputes in other states. But attorneys who represent companies say they have legitimate reasons to put out-of-state-venue or choice-of-law provisions in employment contracts. Because a formidable legal gray area remains, lawyers on both sides often advise their clients to tread cautiously.

By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer

      SAN FRANCISCO - When a Mill Valley man suffering from multiple sclerosis challenged his firing last year, his employer told him he would have to travel to Florida to settle the dispute.
      Matthew Dwyer is claiming disability discrimination because his supervisors told him he wasn't physically able to do the job he was hired for, teaching real estat...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up