By William-Arthur Haynes
Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - Why would two intellectual property attorneys lateral to a firm held in high esteem for its tax-controversy and white-collar criminal defense practices but not particularly known for its IP prowess?
Why, to cash in on cross-selling opportunities, of course, and to augment the intellectual property litigation capacity of...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - Why would two intellectual property attorneys lateral to a firm held in high esteem for its tax-controversy and white-collar criminal defense practices but not particularly known for its IP prowess?
Why, to cash in on cross-selling opportunities, of course, and to augment the intellectual property litigation capacity of...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In