This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Apr. 11, 2017

Recent ruling clarifies two key wage statement questions

One of the most contentious areas of litigation between California employees and employers involves what's listed on the employee's pay stub or wage statement. By John C. Kloosterman and Courtney M. Osborn

John C. Kloosterman

Shareholder

labor & employment

Univ of Wisconsin Law School

See more...

By John C. Kloosterman and Courtney M. Osborn

One of the most contentious areas of litigation between California employees and employers involves what's listed on the employee's pay stub or wage statement. Labor Code Section 226(a) specifies nine things that a wage statement must contain. Litigation on wage statement requirements is a fairly new phenomenon that took off only after the enactment of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) in 2004...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up