U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Mar. 30, 2017
The next big takings case... maybe
The Supreme Court has for years been unable to arrive at a simple rule for determining when a regulation constitutes a taking.
Michael M. Berger
Senior Counsel
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP
2049 Century Park East
Los Angeles , CA 90067
Phone: (310) 312-4185
Fax: (310) 996-6968
Email: mmberger@manatt.com
USC Law School
Michael M. Berger is senior counsel at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, where he is co-chair of the Appellate Practice Group. He has argued four takings cases in the U.S. Supreme Court.
TAKINGS TALK
On Monday, March 20, the eyes of the takings world were focused on the U.S. Supreme Court. The lines had been drawn and the chosen warriors assembled. It promised to be a furious battle, for there were not merely two opponents in the ring, there were four: one representing the interests of property owners and three presenting various versions of the government side. The case was Murr v. Wisconsin. Not only did the state o...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In