This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Mar. 29, 2017

Ruling weighs distributions in violation of absolute priority rule

A recent Supreme Court ruling has closed the door to distribution of entire estates in violation of the absolute priority rule.

Evan M. Jones

Partner
O'Melveny & Myers LLP

restructuring

400 S Hope St
Los Angeles , CA 90071-2899

Phone: (213) 430-6236

Fax: (213) 430-6407

Email: ejones@omm.com

UC Berkeley Boalt Hall

Evan Jones is a restructuring partner at O'Melveny & Myers LLP and has broad experience in all facets of reorganization — both in and out of court — having represented bank groups, secured creditors, debtors, unsecured creditor committees, acquirers of distressed assets, and other constituents

See more...

Daniel S. Shamah

Counsel
O'Melveny & Myers LLP

bankruptcy

Daniel Shamah is counsel at O'Melveny in New York. He advises financial institutions, hedge funds and public and private companies in a wide array of restructuring, bankruptcy, and insolvency cases.

See more...

In a widely anticipated ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court in Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp., 2017 DJDAR 2805 (March 22, 2017), ruled that bankruptcy courts "may not approve structured dismissals that provide for distributions that do not follow ordinary priority rules without the consent of affected creditors." In doing so, the court rejected the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that the circumstances were an unusual "rare case," justifying deviation from the ordinary prio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up