This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Labor/Employment

May 12, 2000

Eye Spy

Practitioner: Employment Law By Andrea M. Kimball Thanks to Monica Lewinsky's not-so-confidential discussions with Linda Tripp, the issue of recording telephone conversations has made national headlines. Tripp now faces charges under Maryland law for recording those conversations without Lewinsky's consent. California has similar statutes prohibiting recording and eavesdropping on telephone conversations.

Employment Law
By Andrea M. Kimball

        Thanks to Monica Lewinsky's not-so-confidential discussions with Linda Tripp, the issue of recording telephone conversations has made national headlines. Tripp now faces charges under Maryland law for recording those conversations without Lewinsky's consent. California has similar statutes prohibiting recording and eavesdropping on telephone conversations. Empl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up