This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Mar. 29, 2000

Wrongs or

FORUM The Miranda rule is one tool we have and need to guard us against our guardians. Page 6. By Michael J. Kennedy I attended the showdown between the redoubtable Yale Kamisar and Paul Cassell at the University of San Diego, and I was struck by the callow, shallow, reactionary, thoughtless and doctrinally challenged reactionism of Cassell as he sought to convince the largely academic audience of the merits of undoing the Miranda v. Arizona rule.

By Michael J. Kennedy
        I attended the showdown between the redoubtable Yale Kamisar and Paul Cassell at the University of San Diego, and I was struck by the callow, shallow, reactionary, thoughtless and doctrinally challenged reactionism of Cassell as he sought to convince the largely academic audience of the merits of undoing the Miranda v. Arizona rule.
  ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)