By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer The California Supreme Court narrowly averted disaster this week in an important antitrust case that was plagued by conflicts of interest with the justices' drug company stock holdings. Three of the seven justices - Joyce L. Kennard, Ming W. Chin and Carol A. Corrigan - had to recuse themselves from hearing the appeal because they own stock in one or more of the 17 different pharmaceutical company defendan...
Daily Journal Staff Writer The California Supreme Court narrowly averted disaster this week in an important antitrust case that was plagued by conflicts of interest with the justices' drug company stock holdings. Three of the seven justices - Joyce L. Kennard, Ming W. Chin and Carol A. Corrigan - had to recuse themselves from hearing the appeal because they own stock in one or more of the 17 different pharmaceutical company defendan...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In