This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Labor/Employment

Mar. 2, 2007

Wrongly Decided Case Hampers Employee Misconduct Probes

Forum Column - By Brian P. Walter and Connie M. Chuang - It's hard enough for a public entity to conduct employee misconduct investigations. A recent appellate opinion has just made the process much more difficult.

FORUM COLUMN

By Brian P. Walter and Connie M. Chuang
     
      The 6th District Court of Appeal recently held, in Spielbauer v. County of Santa Clara, 146 Cal.App.4th 416 (2007), that a public employer cannot discipline an employee for refusing to answer incriminating questions, even when the employer advises the employee that his statements cannot be used against him in a subsequent criminal ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up