By Dennis Pfaff
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A federal court has ruled that by conserving water for fish and environmental purposes, federal officials did not breach contracts to Central Valley districts supplying farms and cities.
The decision, issued Tuesday by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, also suggested that no constitutional property-rights issue existed in the case....
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A federal court has ruled that by conserving water for fish and environmental purposes, federal officials did not breach contracts to Central Valley districts supplying farms and cities.
The decision, issued Tuesday by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, also suggested that no constitutional property-rights issue existed in the case....
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In