This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Jun. 21, 2005

Write On

EXTRA Column - Entertainment Law - By Aaron J. Moss - In a decision with wide-ranging implications for writers, producers and anyone else in the business of pitching or receiving creative property, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in Grosso v. Miramax that a writer who submitted a screenplay to a studio could sue the studio for making a movie containing similar ideas, even though the movie was not similar enough to the screenplay to support a copyright infringement claim.

By Aaron J. Moss
        
        In a decision with wide-ranging implications for writers, producers and anyone else in the business of pitching or receiving creative property, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in Grosso v. Miramax that a writer who submitted a screenplay to a studio could sue the studio for making...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up