This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Mar. 1, 2014

Legal malpractice: Show me the damage!

An attorney should be able to argue that actual payment of an adverse judgment is a prerequisite because otherwise a plaintiff could recover for a judgment that never would have been paid. By Kenneth C. Feldman and David D. Samani

Kenneth C. Feldman

Partner
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Certified Specialist in Legal Malpractice

633 W 5th St Ste 4000
Los Angeles , CA 90071

Phone: (213) 250-1800

Fax: (213) 250-7900

Email: Ken.Feldman@lewisbrisbois.com

Loyola Law School

Kenneth is firm-wide chair of the legal malpractice defense group at Lewis Brisbois. He is a certified specialist, legal malpractice law, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization, and is vice chair of the State Bar Legal Malpractice Law Advisory Commission. Mr. Feldman is the author of "California Legal Malpractice & Malicious Prosecution Liability Handbook."

See more...

David D. Samani

Senior Associate
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP

professional liability

633 W 5th St Ste 4000
Los Angeles , CA 90071

Phone: (213) 250-1800

Fax: (213) 250-7900

Email: david.samani@lewisbrisbois.com

Cornell University Law School

David is in Lewis Brisbois' professional liability group, regularly defends lawyers. He is a co-author of the California Legal Malpractice & Malicious Prosecution Liability Handbook, which is now in its 7th Edition.

See more...

On Jan. 24, our year-end recap of notable 2013 decisions affecting lawyers discussed Wise v. DLA Piper, 220 Cal. App. 4th 1180 (2013). Wise involved the reversal of a judgment in a legal malpractice case because the plaintiff had not demonstrated that the underlying judgment, purportedly lost due to attorney malpractice, was collectible. This is a prima facie element of a legal malpractice claim asserting negligence in the prosecution of a claim for damages. See Garretson v. Mill...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up