This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 23, 2010

Hanging By a Thread: Non-Solicitation Clauses and the Trade Secret Exception

It is time for employers to let go of invalid and liability-inviting non-solicitation clauses, by Matthew F. Miller and Erik S. Morrison of Carroll, Burdick & McDonough.

Matthew F. Miller and Erik S. Morrison

Like scofflaw cell phone clutching drivers, customer non-solicitation clauses remain ubiquitous in California employment contracts although largely invalid and unenforceable under established law. Why can't sophisticated employers let go of these void and potentially liability-inviting clauses? Conventional wisdom that most employees will blindly abide non-solicits clearly no longer holds true - a cursory Interne...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up