This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Zoning, Planning and Use

Dec. 12, 2009

Remedies Limited for Rejected Land-Use Projects

Matthew Francois of Cassidy, Shimko, Dawson & Kawakami explains how recent cases have limited remedies for developers and property owners.

By Matthew Francois

Three recent California appellate court cases underscore the limited remedies a developer or property owner has to enforce an agency's obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.

In Las Lomas Land Co., LLC v. City of Los Angeles, 177 Cal.App.4th 837 (2009), the developer, Las Lomas, challenged the city of Los Angeles's termination of environmental review for a maj...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up