This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 4, 2009

Preclusion Rules Causes Conflict

Attorneys Benjamin Shatz and Lara Krieger ask whether alternative grounds should or should not be precluded.

By Benjamin Shatz and Lara Krieger

Assume that a California Superior Court relies on two different and independent reasons to reach a judgment. Then, the Court of Appeal affirms the judgment based on one of these reasons, but never bothers to mention the alternative ground. Can the ground that was ignored on appeal still have preclusive effect? Surprisingly, the answer probably depends on whether the preclusion question arises in state or federal court - even though Calif...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up