This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Dec. 11, 2009

Causation Without Cause

Joshua Traver of Cole Pedroza says CA Civil Jury Instruction No. 430 fails to accurately state the application of two different tests for causation.

By Joshua Traver

Causation in personal injury and property damage cases has long been a perplexing topic. Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instruction (CACI) No. 430, while a formidable attempt to create a broadly applicable, plain-English causation instruction, falls short of accurately stating California law with regard to this critical issue.

Two different tests have emerged for determining cause-in-fact in most negligence cases - the "but-for" test a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up