This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 11, 2009

What's Good for Norwalk Isn't Good for Switzerland

Gideon Kanner of Loyola Law School compares the media's treatment of two instances of land-use regulation and the First Amendment.

By Gideon Kanner

"Disgraceful," thundered the New York Times editorial (A Vote for Intolerance, Dec. 1, 2009, at p. A34). Goodness, gracious. What was it that got the Grey Lady so riled up, you ask? It was an exercise in democracy - the Swiss went to the polls and by a 57 percent majority referendum vote enacted a law that forbids the construction of minarets. Not mosques. Just minarets. You know, those tall slender towers adjacent to mosques, from which the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up