This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Sep. 6, 2000

Conflicting Roles

Legal Malpractice by Alec H. Boyd and John M. Orr. The unique role played by monitoring counsel raises obvious questions regarding the scope of their legal liability.

        By Alec H. Boyd and John M. Orr
        
        In two recent decisions, the California courts have begun to grapple with the legal-malpractice implications of insurer-retained monitoring counsel. While this inquiry is in its infancy, the continuing use of monitoring counsel by insurers suggests that the development of this body o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)