Real Estate/Development
Sep. 2, 2000
Incisive decision
By Randall L. Mason and Jeffry A. Miller Our clients' stress level has just gone down. In a triumph for common sense, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two (Riverside), has held that a tenant who signs a tenant estoppel certificate is bound by the facts recited in the estoppel certificate. In its June 13, 2000, opinion in Plaza Freeway Limited Partnership v.
By Randall L. Mason and Jeffry A. Miller
Our clients' stress level has just gone down. In a triumph for common sense, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two (Riverside), has held that a tenant who signs a tenant estoppel certificate is bound by the facts recited in the estoppel certificate. In its June 13, 2000, opinion in Plaza Freeway Limited Partnership v. First Mountain Bank, the Court of Appeal found facts contained in an e...
Our clients' stress level has just gone down. In a triumph for common sense, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two (Riverside), has held that a tenant who signs a tenant estoppel certificate is bound by the facts recited in the estoppel certificate. In its June 13, 2000, opinion in Plaza Freeway Limited Partnership v. First Mountain Bank, the Court of Appeal found facts contained in an e...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In