This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Nov. 14, 2013

In 9th Circuit, en banc decisions leave judges' names out

Judges explain themselves at length and sign their work in opinions and orders at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But secrecy rules when it comes to deciding whether to rehear an important case en banc.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Judges explain themselves at length and sign their work in opinions and orders at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But secrecy rules when it comes to one of the court's most crucial tasks: deciding whether to rehear an important case en banc.


Circuit Judge Stephen R. Reinhardt has been trying for two decades to make the court more transparent. So far, no luck. The 4th and 5th circuits have ta...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up