This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Nov. 12, 2013

Food labeling cases getting more skeptical reception

As the explosion of cases claiming food companies mislabel products make its way through the courts, Northern District judges, once thought of as plaintiff-friendly on these matters, are increasingly skeptical.


By Hadley Robinson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A federal judge in the Northern District recently scolded chip eaters for providing "exceptionally bare legal conclusions" when they tried lumping in 85 other Frito-Lay products to the five they actually purchased in a complaint about "all natural" and "0 trans fat" labels. U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti's order in October allowed only claims on the five purchased Frito-La...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up