This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jun. 5, 2012

Ruling could lead to more SLAPP motions

A state appellate court decided for the first time that trial judges can use the anti-SLAPP statute to strike a portion of a cause of action while leaving intact certain arguments.


By Jason W. Armstrong


Daily Journal Staff Writer


RIVERSIDE - In an opinion that could lead more defendants to use California's anti-SLAPP statute as a tool to try to knock down lawsuits, a state appellate court decided for the first time that trial judges can use it to strike a portion of a cause of action while leaving intact certain arguments.


Legal experts said the May 30 published 4th District Court of Appeal opinion could result in ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up