This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

May 23, 2013

Early disclosure would gut judicial complaint system

Whether California judges would actually engage in retaliatory behavior toward those who initiated complaints against them or not is not the point. By Susan Rutberg and Peter Keane


By Susan Rutberg and Peter Keane


The State Commission on Judicial Performance performs an invaluable public service: It protects the public by investigating complaints against judges and imposing discipline when those complaints turn out to be justified. During its recent biennial rule review, the commission declined to adopt a rule proposed by the California Judges' Association (CJA), which would have forced the commission to provide full discovery to a jud...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up