Labor/Employment
May 3, 2006
Casino's Grooming Rules Held as 'Essentially Equal' for Sexes
Focus Column - By Richard S. Rosenberg and John J. Manier - According to a recent 9th Circuit en banc decision, "[g]rooming standards that appropriately differentiate between the genders are not facially discriminatory" and thus do not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et seq. Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., 2006 DJDAR 4549 (9th Cir. April 14, 2006).
By Richard S. Rosenberg and John J. Manier
According to a recent 9th Circuit en banc decision, "[g]rooming standards that appropriately differentiate between the genders are not facially discriminatory" and thus do not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et seq. Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., 2006 DJDAR 4549 (9th Cir. Apr...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In