This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family

May 2, 2006

Legal Maxim: Orders Are Only Good If They Can Be Enforced

Focus Column - By Shelley L. Albaum, Harold J. Cohn and Seth D. Kramer - It is not uncommon in family law proceedings for the court to make temporary orders pending trial regarding issues of support, custody and property. These orders define the rights and responsibilities between the parties for the pendency of the case.

Focus Column

By Shelley L. Albaum, Harold J. Cohn and Seth D. Kramer

     
      It is not uncommon in family law proceedings for the court to make temporary orders pending trial regarding issues of support, custody and property. These orders define the rights and responsibilities between the parties for the pendency of the case. It is a maxim in family law that orders are only good if you enforce ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up