This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Apr. 20, 2006

Court Mulls Right to Hire Attorney

WASHINGTON - The plight of a criminal defendant whose Southern California attorney was yanked off his case in a Missouri courtroom drew sympathy from the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday in a spirited debate over the proper remedy when a judge denies a defendant the right to hire his counsel of choice.

By Brent Kendall
Daily Journal Staff Writer

      WASHINGTON - The plight of a criminal defendant whose Southern California attorney was yanked off his case in a Missouri courtroom drew sympathy from the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday in a spirited debate over the proper remedy when a judge denies a defendant the right to hire his counsel of choice.
      The high court was rev...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up