This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Apr. 15, 2006

'Pound' Asserts a Strict Line in Successive Representations

Focus Column - By Catherine K. La Tempa - California courts have consistently held that the appearance of impropriety is not an independent basis for attorney disqualification under California law. See, e.g., DCH Health Services Corp. v. Wa

Focus Column

By Catherine K. La Tempa

     
      California courts have consistently held that the appearance of impropriety is not an independent basis for attorney disqualification under California law. See, e.g., DCH Health Services Corp. v. Waite, 95 Cal.App.4th 829 (2002); Hetos Investments, Ltd. v. Kurtin, 110 Cal.App.4th 36 (2003); and Addam v. Superior Court, 116 Cal....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up