Environmental
Mar. 28, 2006
Endangered Species Act Is Not a Superlaw
Forum Column - By Roderick E. Walston - Arecent 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision addresses the potential conflict or tension between two congressional goals - one that encourages states to administer programs to prevent water pollution and the other providing for protection of endangered species. Defenders of Wildlife v. Environmental Protection Agency , 420 F.3d 946 (2005). Although the decision advances the goal of protecting endangered species, it does so at the expense of the
By Roderick E. Walston
Arecent 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision addresses the potential conflict or tension between two congressional goals - one that encourages states to administer programs to prevent water pollution and the other providing for protection of endangered species. Defenders of Wildlife v. Environmental ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In