This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

California Supreme Court

Dec. 2, 2009

Bar Raised for Claims Against Insurers

David Nemecek Jr. of Long & Levit says Zhang v. Superior Court may subject insurers who engage in 'fraudulent conduct' to class action lawsuits.

By David Nemeck Jr.

The California Supreme Court ruled over 20 years ago that there is no private right of action for violations of the Uniform Insurance Practices Act (Insurance Code Section 790.03, et seq.) However, a recent decision, Zhang v. Superior Court, 09 C.D.O.S. 13302 (Oct. 29, 2009), gives plaintiffs an end-run around the bar on claims for violation of the Uniform Insurance Practices Act. The Zhang decision potentially opens the door for c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up