This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 1, 2009

The Flip-side to Workplace Incident Lawsuits

Frederic Grannis and Jeffrey Ikejiri of Sedgwick Detert present a counter argument under Elsner v. Uveges for workplace incident cases.

By Frederic Grannis and Jeffrey Ikejiri

The California Supreme Court's decision in Elsner v. Uveges (2004) 34 Cal. 4th 915 was considered by many observers to be bad news for defendants in personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. Elsner construed a 1999 amendment to Labor Code Section 6304.5 as a repeal of a 30-year-old rule, which precluded any use or consideration of California Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) provisions and regulations in suc...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up