Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - The state Supreme Court considered Wednesday whether a man may avoid liability after his dog attacked a kennel worker, because the worker should have known of the risks involved in caring for a dog.
The case was brought by a Humboldt County woman who suffered permanent nerve damage after a dog in her care mauled...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In