This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Feb. 6, 2013

Companies can require consumers to provide addresses, phone numbers to download apps

The 4-3 decision says Internet transactions are exempt from a state law banning merchants from requesting addresses and phone numbers. Justice Marvin R. Baxter wrote his first separate dissent in nearly three years.


By Emily Green


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - Apple Inc. acted lawfully when it required consumers to provide their addresses and phone numbers in order to download applications from the company, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday in a 4-3 decision.


The decision says Internet transactions are exempt from a state law banning merchants from requesting addresses and phone numbers. The ruling will affect thousands - if not millions -...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up