By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer SAN FRANCISCO - A case against cigarette companies accused of producing false advertising could spell the end of California's unfair competition law as consumer lawyers know it. A Newport Beach plaintiffs' attorney seemed to struggle Tuesday as he tried to explain to the California Supreme Court why Proposition 64, a 2005 voter initiative that targeted consumer class actions under the unfair competition la...
Daily Journal Staff Writer SAN FRANCISCO - A case against cigarette companies accused of producing false advertising could spell the end of California's unfair competition law as consumer lawyers know it. A Newport Beach plaintiffs' attorney seemed to struggle Tuesday as he tried to explain to the California Supreme Court why Proposition 64, a 2005 voter initiative that targeted consumer class actions under the unfair competition la...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In