This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Mar. 5, 2009

Class Actions In Peril in Tobacco Case

A case against cigarette companies accused of producing false advertising could spell the end of California's unfair competition law as consumer lawyers know it.

By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer

SAN FRANCISCO - A case against cigarette companies accused of producing false advertising could spell the end of California's unfair competition law as consumer lawyers know it.

A Newport Beach plaintiffs' attorney seemed to struggle Tuesday as he tried to explain to the California Supreme Court why Proposition 64, a 2005 voter initiative that targeted consumer class actions under the unfair competition la...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up