Government,
Administrative/Regulatory
May 2, 2017
Ballot initiative fails to address subset of inmates
Proposition 57 as currently written will do little (if anything) to reduce overcrowding caused by parole eligible life-term inmates.
Sharif E. Jacob
Partner
Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP
intellectual property litigation, complex business disputes
633 Battery St
San Francisco , CA 94111-1809
Phone: (415) 391-5400
Email: sjacob@keker.com
UC Hastings
Sharif focuses on intellectual property litigation, complex business disputes and representing individuals
Andrea Nill Sanchez
Associate
Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP
633 Battery St
San Francisco , CA 94111-1809
Phone: (415) 773-6631
Email: anillsanchez@kvn.com
Yale Law School
This past November, California voters approved Proposition 57, a ballot initiative instituting a series of measures aimed at reducing the state's prison population. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) issued new, emergency regulations implementing Prop. 57 on March 24, which the Office of Administrative Law approved on April 13.
While Prop. 57 and the CDCR's emergency regulations have received widespread attention for the overall effects they will have ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In