This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jan. 11, 2007

Pulled Over, Not Out

FOCUS COLUMN - By Rodney Richard Jones - Rarely do the courts hold that a search of a car was improper. A Mendocino criminal lawyer examines a recent California appellate decision that suppressed evidence arising out of a bad traffic stop.

Focus Column

By Rodney Richard Jones
     
      Successful suppression motions are an endangered species. Nobody knows that better than the deputy public defenders in the trenches trying each day to articulate how and why the Fourth Amendment should be protecting their clients' rights and why seized evidence really ought to be suppressed. A holding by a court of appeal that a search was unreasonable ha...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up