Focus Column
By Rodney Richard Jones
Successful suppression motions are an endangered species. Nobody knows that better than the deputy public defenders in the trenches trying each day to articulate how and why the Fourth Amendment should be protecting their clients' rights and why seized evidence really ought to be suppressed. A holding by a court of appeal that a search was unreasonable ha...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In