California Supreme Court
Jun. 5, 2009
Publicity, Privacy Cases Get Mixed Review From State Justices
The California Supreme Court seemed to be searching Wednesday for ways to help a professional model get damages from Nestle for plastering his face on millions of Taster's Choice coffee jars throughout the world without his knowledge or compensating him.




Daily Journal Staff Writer The California Supreme Court seemed to be searching Wednesday for ways to help a professional model win damages from food giant Nestlé for plastering his face on millions of Taster's Choice coffee jars throughout the world without informing or compensating him. Despite those intentions, the justices signaled they might have to apply a statute of limitations on model Russell Christoff's right of publicity c...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In