This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jun. 4, 2009

Ruling Puts Renewed Emphasis on Foresight in Drafting Licenses

When it comes to drafting a patent license, what goes unsaid is just as important as what is said, write Morgan Fong, Robin Schulman and Jason Soo.

By Morgan Fong, Robin Schulman and Jason Soo

Traditionally, a covenant not to sue was viewed as a narrower provision than a patent license because the former did not extend to cover the licensee's customers. But according to a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in TransCore LP v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp., 563 F.3d 1271 (Fed. Cir. 2009), an unconditional covenant not to sue is tantamount to a pat...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up