This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Apr. 4, 2013

A bad outcome for Mr. Good

A recent case out of the 3rd District Court of Appeal shows how a stubborn refusal to follow the rules on appealability can doom what could be a meritorious appeal. By Ilana R. Herscovitz and Paul D. Fogel


By Ilana R. Herscovitz and Paul D. Fogel


Enough already! So says the 3rd District Court of Appeal with respect to appellants who disregard the rules concerning appealability. In Good v. Miller, 2013 DJDAR 3226, (March 13, 2013), the Court of Appeal conveyed this message the hard way, criticizing an appellant's "stubborn refusal to follow the rules even after they have been explained," and dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up