This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Mar. 30, 2013

Time to roll back the mediation privilege

Bottom line, the mediation privilege has gone too far. It is time to reel it in and return to a sensible privilege that does not infringe on parties' rights. By Allen B. Grodsky


By Allen B. Grodsky


Over the years, the Legislature and the California Supreme Court have expanded the mediation privilege far beyond what it needs to be to serve its purpose - that is, to encourage the candor necessary for a successful mediation. The last straw was Cassel v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 113 (2011), in which the state Supreme Court interpreted the mediation privilege to cover confidential communications between a lawyer and client at the me...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up