Over the years, the Legislature and the California Supreme Court have expanded the mediation privilege far beyond what it needs to be to serve its purpose - that is, to encourage the candor necessary for a successful mediation. The last straw was Cassel v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 113 (2011), in which the state Supreme Court interpreted the mediation privilege to cover confidential communications between a lawyer and client at the me...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In