This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 26, 2013

Negligent lawyers still cannot SLAPP their former clients

Contrary to the synopsis of a 2012 decision, negligent lawyers still cannot file anti-SLAPP motions or indemnity claims in legal malpractice lawsuits. By Thomas Trapani


By Thomas Trapani


The synopsis for Chodos v. Cole, 210 Cal. App. 4th 692 (2012), proclaimed: "Lawyer sued for attorney malpractice in connection with settlement of divorce proceeding may sue other lawyers who independently reviewed the settlement." If true, this decision would reverse long-standing precedent barring a defendant lawyer's indemnity claim against the former client's other lawyers in California legal malpractice actions. Howe...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up