This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Mar. 23, 2013

When can 'nonsignatories' compel arbitration?

Collateral consequences in arbitration can affect the process substantially, and should be anticipated or confronted as early as possible.

Lawrence Waddington

Neutral, JAMS

Email: waddington1@aol.com

Lawrence is a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge and former assistant attorney general for the state of California. He is author of "Disorder in the Court" at Amazon.com. He also edits the 9th Circuit blog, "The 9th Circuit Watch."

Counsel who write a comprehensive and carefully worded arbitration clause in a contract may assume the conduct of any arbitration will ensue routinely if the court grants the petition to arbitrate a future dispute between the parties. Yet collateral consequences in arbitration can affect the process unless anticipated or confronted as early as possible. Issues of arbitrator jurisdiction, emergence of nonsignatories, mixed arbitrable and nonarbitrable claims, and the doctrine of arbitrabili...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)