This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 25, 2009

Call to Review 'Over-Seizing' Test Results

Dylan Malagrino of University of La Verne College of Law comments on the 9th Circuit's request to review U.S. v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.

By Dylan Malagrino

Back in August 2009, professional baseball players hit a homerun in court, securing a win for individual privacy rights over governmental intrusion. But now, the appellate court's call to review the replay might set us back to a state of "over-seizing."

In U.S. v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 579 F.3d 989 (2009), a case about the federal investigation into professional baseball players' steroid use, the U.S. Court of Appeals for th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up