Letter to the Editor
Nov. 18, 2009
Consequences of Wireless Case Are Not So Dire
Daniel Barer of Pollak, Vida and Fisher comments on what Sprint v. Palos Verdes Estates really means for wireless telecommunications development.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
In his opinion piece, The 9th Circuit Deals a Major Blow to Wireless (Nov. 12), Michael Shonafelt writes about a decision in a case his client, Sprint brought: Sprint v. Palos Verdes Estates case, 583 F.3d 716 (9th Cir. 2009). He notes that Sprint is pursuing a rehearing petition in that case. So, not unexpectedly, his piece is a work of advocacy. And, not unexpectedly, Mr. Shonafelt omits several facts that cont...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In