By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer Public law firms are not automatically disqualified from a case when a conflict of interest arises with a previous client, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday. But governmental agencies still have the burden to prove that the ethical walls they set up to guarantee client confidentiality are properly maintained. In re Charlisse C., S152822. The ruling vindicates the 2005 reorganizatio...
Daily Journal Staff Writer Public law firms are not automatically disqualified from a case when a conflict of interest arises with a previous client, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday. But governmental agencies still have the burden to prove that the ethical walls they set up to guarantee client confidentiality are properly maintained. In re Charlisse C., S152822. The ruling vindicates the 2005 reorganizatio...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In