This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 21, 2008

Marking the Territory

While the 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act was expected to make things easier for the owners of famous marks, recent cases show that trademark dilution remains as unpredictable as ever, write Phillip Haack and Jed Wakefield. - Focus Column

FOCUS COLUMN

By Phillip Haack and Jed Wakefield

In 2006, Congress passed the Trademark Dilution Revision Act. Hailed by some and criticized by others, the act was widely expected to make it easier for the owners of famous trademarks to prevail in claims for trademark dilution. Unlike trademark infringement, which occurs when there is a likelihood of confusion between trademarks, dilution occurs when there is a "lessening of the capacity of a famo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up